Kill chain and long-range missile gave Pakistan the sting in Rafale shootdown, in line with a current report by Reuters.
On Aug. 2, 2025, an attention-grabbing story by Reuter’s Saeed Shah and Shivam Patel laid out how a Pakistan Air Drive J-10C downed not less than one Indian Air Drive Rafale utilizing a PL-15 air-to-air missile fired from roughly 200 km, a kill envelope Indian planners didn’t count on the PAF to attain that evening.
The Reuters reconstruction of the Might 7, 2025 air battle over (and simply inside) Pakistan reads like a guidelines of contemporary air warfare: BVR (Past-Visible-Vary) photographs, multi-domain sensor fusion, digital assault, and, crucially, data superiority (or lack thereof) together with numerous assumptions in regards to the enemy’s weapons that turned out to be flawed.
Whereas only a few particulars have been formally confirmed so far, imagery and evaluation level to not less than one Rafale loss, allegedly the primary fight loss for the sort. Within the aftermath of the aerial engagements, Indian officers declined remark; social media lit up with counter-claims and disinformation; and solely fragments of bodily proof (a MICA nonetheless on its pylon, engine particles) emerged from inside India. The Reuters piece provides names, timing, and the operational plumbing behind what we noticed within the fog of warfare.
Two traces within the Reuters story bounce out. First, that Pakistan’s Air Chief reportedly advised his workforce, “He needed Rafales.” Second, that the decisive issue wasn’t platform A versus platform B, however data: as retired RAF Air Marshal Greg Bagwell put it, “The winner on this was the facet that had the perfect situational consciousness.” These particulars match the observable sample of the evening: either side largely stayed inside nationwide airspace, fought at vary, and relied on their airborne and floor sensors to construct an image quicker than the opposite man.
We have now typically highlighted how essential in trendy warfare is to attain the so-called “Data Superiority” (i.e. the operational benefit derived from the flexibility to gather, course of, and disseminate an uninterrupted movement of knowledge whereas exploiting or denying an adversary’s means to do the identical).
Spoke to #PakistanAirForce Chief ACM Zaheer Ahmed Baber yesterday. The PAF introduced down the IAF’s whole kill chain on Might 5-10. Satellite tv for pc downlinks had been scuttled, radars jammed and GPS killed. IAF was lucky to not lose greater than 4 , sure 4, Rafales.
— Alan Warnes (@warnesyworld) July 9, 2025
Within the aerial engagement between India and Pakistan, what really tipped the scales was, in line with Reuters, an Indian intelligence miss on the efficient vary of the PL-15. Indian aircrews believed they had been exterior engagement distance, roughly 150 km, a determine related to an export-limited variant, Nonetheless, they weren’t. If the J-10C launched from ~200 km as Pakistani officers contend (and presumably farther, in line with Indian officers interviewed), the shot falls into the longest documented BVR kills thus far.We should always caveat that vary is a operate of geometry and kinematics, not a static quantity, as altitude, velocity, goal facet, and steering assist matter, however it underscores the purpose: should you mis-read the envelope, you’ll fly the flawed recreation plan.
Official kill mark of an Indian Rafale jet on the facet of a Pakistani J-10C. pic.twitter.com/zYs40vqyYh
— Conflict Report (@clashreport) Might 18, 2025
The second pillar is networking. In line with Pakistani officers, the PAF fused feeds throughout air, land and area – what they describe as a homegrown “Information Hyperlink 17” spine – to cross radar tracks from a standoff surveillance platform to ahead J-10Cs, letting the shooters run quiet and nonetheless prosecute long-range photographs. India, with a extra numerous fleet from a number of suppliers, remains to be knitting collectively a comparable kill chain.
Beware, none of this proves Chinese language “{hardware}” is universally superior to Western one; it does present how a coherent community, fielded and rehearsed, can erase a platform or a numbers hole.
It’s additionally in keeping with the sample we tracked within the days after Might 7. Reuters beforehand reported that J-10Cs downed not less than two Indian plane; Delhi has not publicly acknowledged the Rafale loss, however senior French officers later indicated they’d seen proof of the shoot-down. In the meantime, India tailored shortly, shifted ways, and used BrahMos strikes towards Pakistani navy infrastructure earlier than a ceasefire took maintain: on Might 10, India claimed it struck not less than 9 air bases and radar websites in Pakistan; it additionally hit a surveillance aircraft parked in a hangar in southern Pakistan.
A ceasefire was agreed later that day, after U.S. officers held talks with either side.
For a lot of navy aviation watchers, the aerial engagement was the possibility to to show it right into a referendum on the Rafale, however it’s really one thing else, a well-flown, well-supported 4.5-gen fighter can nonetheless be stunned if the opposing facet brings an extended attain, higher timing, and a cleaner community on a given evening. The Rafale’s kinematics, sensors, and Spectra suite stay formidable; what failed, per Reuters’ sources, was the idea set. India seems to be updating each gear (notably on the Su-30MKI) and TTPs accordingly. Theref0re, it’s protected to imagine a future BVR air battle might have a unique consequence.
Dassault Denies CEO Commented on Rafale Losses by India
Dassault Aviation denied that CEO Éric Trappier made any feedback about Rafale fighter jet losses throughout India’s Operation Sindoor, contradicting media reviews quoting him.
Indian media earlier claimed Trappier stated India… pic.twitter.com/PwWfZVEqAa
— Conflict Report (@clashreport) July 9, 2025
Apparently, within the days following the engagement, India’s deputy military chief, Lt. Gen. Rahul Singh, urged that Pakistan might have obtained “dwell inputs” from China in the course of the air battles, hinting on the attainable sharing of real-time radar and satellite tv for pc knowledge. Nonetheless, he didn’t current any proof to assist the declare, and Islamabad firmly denied the accusation.
Questioned about navy cooperation with Pakistan throughout a press briefing in July, Chinese language Overseas Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning described the collaboration as a part of the “regular cooperation between the 2 international locations” and acknowledged that it was not directed towards any third celebration.
In the meantime, Beijing’s air chief, Lt. Gen. Wang Gang, visited Pakistan in July to reportedly focus on how Chinese language programs had been used to ascertain the “kill chain” that led to the Rafale shootdown, in line with two Pakistani Air Drive officers. When requested in regards to the assembly, Chinese language authorities didn’t remark, whereas Pakistan’s navy later acknowledged that Wang had proven a powerful curiosity in PAF’s operational expertise in Multi-Area Operations.
Again on Might 7, we urged warning as photographs and claims flooded the timeline. A few of these early photographs did line up with a Rafale loss, and French reporting later added weight to that evaluation. The brand new Reuters account doesn’t finish the controversy as Delhi nonetheless hasn’t confirmed (though some lawmakers have), however it supplies probably the most full open-source narrative but of how the engagement unfolded and why.
India’s Kerala MP Ok Francis George:
India misplaced 5 fighter jets: 3 Rafales, 1 Sukhoi-30MKI, 1 MiG-29 in unacknowledged wartime incidents.
All shot down in our personal territory.
He accused the federal government of hiding the losses, citing unnamed sources. pic.twitter.com/U30JeA8JUf
— Conflict Report (@clashreport) July 29, 2025
If there’s a single lesson right here for air forces in all places, it’s this: know the true numbers, not the datasheet ones; follow the hyperlinks, not simply the launches; and assume your opponent is doing the identical.
CDS Anil Chauhan has stated that #OperationSindoor remains to be on.This has been stated to offer escape path to the federal government to not focus on the air battle on Might 7/8 evening with the opposition within the Parliament.With out this, relaxation is of little consequence as a result of either side have…
— Pravin Sawhney (@PravinSawhney) July 26, 2025
