Engine producer Pratt & Whitney will use new digital design expertise to speed up its work on the XA103, its submission for the U.S. Air Drive’s Subsequent Technology Adaptive Propulsion (NGAP) program.
Subsequent Technology Adaptive Propulsion, or NGAP, requires the event of adaptive cycle engines that may be reconfigured in flight between excessive efficiency and excessive effectivity modes by adjusting the engine’s bypass ratio. The successful design from this system is predicted to ultimately energy the U.S. Air Drive’s subsequent technology fighter, the Boeing F-47, although with NGAP not anticipated to be finalised till 2030 there’s a robust chance that preliminary fashions must depend on an interim engine possibility.
RTX’s Pratt & Whitney is providing the XA103 design for the NGAP venture, going face to face with GE Aerospace’s XA102. Each engines have been influenced by earlier adaptive cycle designs produced by each corporations beneath the Adaptive Engine Transition Program (AETP), supposed to develop a brand new powerplant for the F-35 Lightning II. AETP was scrapped in 2023 in favour of extra incremental upgrades to the present F135 engine, however classes discovered throughout this system haven’t been forgotten.
Each the XA102 and XA103 handed detailed design opinions earlier this yr. Floor testing of prototype fashions is predicted to begin in direction of the late 2020s. Each corporations are leveraging new design strategies and expertise to perform work at a a lot sooner fee.
President of Navy Engines for Pratt & Whitney, Jill Albertelli, remarked that “We’re paving the way in which with digital on NGAP, a lot in order that the speed at which we’re delivering XA103 technical knowledge packages has doubled. Mannequin-based design ties all of the puzzle items collectively, fostering fixed collaboration, and we’re making use of these learnings throughout our engine portfolio.”
The corporate has privately invested $30 million over the course of this yr into its model-based surroundings, which can profit the design processes for all engines produced by the corporate. Greater than 1000 engineers and assist personnel are anticipated to work on the XA103 program, and it’ll draw upon parts and sources from over 100 suppliers.
Pratt & Whitney’s subsequent milestone for the XA103 would be the completion of an Meeting Readiness Evaluate, which is hoped to nail down the timeline for the engine prototype’s construct and testing phases over the approaching few years. Manufacturing of elements for the prototype engine started earlier this yr, as introduced in July 2025.
ICYMI: Pratt & Whitney cuts metallic and releases imagery of its digitally designed NGAP providing for the @usairforce – the XA103 engine.
Learn extra particulars on @AviationWeek: pic.twitter.com/8t1f98pdq1
— RTX (@RTX_News) July 11, 2025
Adaptive Cycle Engines
The U.S. Air Drive has been looking for adaptive cycle engines for its frontline fighters for many years, however has but to operationally discipline any design. Prototypes within the Superior Tactical Fighter (ATF) competitors, the YF-22 and YF-23, carried competing powerplants from GE and Pratt & Whitney. GE’s design, the YF120 was a sort of adaptive cycle engine that used a double bypass system that might both function like a traditional low bypass turbofan, or direct airflow away from the bypass chamber and into the engine’s sizzling core for added energy at the price of gasoline effectivity. In the long run, Pratt & Whitney’s extra typical F119 engine was chosen and ultimately powered the F-22 Raptor.
As a substitute of a double bypass design, the XA102 and XA103 engines use a three-stream system. Alongside the same old core stream and bypass stream is a further stream of air which may be redirected as required for various efficiency ranges. The earlier AETP designs, the XA100 and XA101, additionally utilised this idea.
The excessive effectivity mode could also be essential to how the U.S. Air Drive hopes to attain a most fight radius on the F-47 of just about double that of an F-22. Efficiency statistics teased by U.S. Air Drive Chief of Employees Basic David Allvin suggests the F-47 is predicted to ship a 1000+ nautical mile fight radius, in comparison with the F-22’s 590 nautical miles. On this mode, which sees extra air diverted by way of the ‘chilly’ bypass chamber, the plane can even be capable to, to a level, reasonable its emitted warmth signature. Whereas the F-47 is predicted to surpass even the F-22’s stealthiness to radar, the warmth produced by excessive efficiency jet engines remains to be a weak goal for infrared search and monitoring (IRST) sensors – that are extensively utilized by opposing plane – and infrared guided missiles.
For a pc, better sign to noise ratios are required to successfully monitor a goal. This is the reason imaging infrared is preferable to optical distinction. Proven beneath is the previous couple of seconds of flight of an AIM-9X.This makes use of imaging infrared to detect and monitor the goal. pic.twitter.com/2izYmSF49R
— Heatloss (@heatloss1986) June 24, 2025
In addition to offering for the plane’s deliberate Mach 2+ prime pace, the F-47’s engines will want to have the ability to ship an enough quantity {of electrical} provide to energy a big selection of superior electronics. Sooner or later, this might even start to incorporate directed power weapons, and a adequate energy overhead must be catered for to permit for future developments of plane sensors and digital warfare (EW) capabilities.
Engine design is considered one space the place the west, and notably america, nonetheless maintains a powerful edge over Russia and China. China’s J-20 stealth fighter solely started to obtain its domestically produced WS-15 engines in 2023, rather than WS-10 engines that are largely the identical as those used on Chinese language Su-27 derivatives just like the J-11. It’s doubtless that the extensively reported prototype fighters seen working in China over the previous yr utilise extra conventional engine designs like these, quite than superior adaptive cycle engines. That is much more strengthened by the obvious want to incorporate three engines on one such design, suggesting an incapability to achieve excessive thrust outputs akin to U.S. and allied engines.
